Divide and Conquer
Adelson Funded study that is iGaming Out Moving, To No Body’s Shock
Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson has funded a study that is four-state, needless to say, doesn’t come up in favor of iGaming.
The benefit of studies is, you can generally cause them to support pretty much any viewpoint on just about anything, according to who’s included and how you interpret the data. And when it’s mega-billionaire Las Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson funding the findings, you will be sure the studies will go any which way you want ‘em to.
Adelson No iGaming Fan Himself
It’s no news that Adelson for reasons being not completely clear to the remaining portion of the mostly pro-iGaming casino industry is vehemently, adamantly opposed to the whole concept of Internet gambling. He has been known to refer to the concept that is very ‘a cancer tumors waiting to occur’ and ‘a toxin which all good people ought to resist,’ and even funded TV and print adverts the 2009 summer towards that end.
Now Adelson’s commissioned poll results with this subject are obtained and released by Nevada public affairs reporter Jon Ralston. The findings focus on four potentially key states in this matter: California, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky. Kentucky? Who knew. And journalist that is even seasoned who hosts the nightly Las Vegas political news show ‘Face to Face’ has noted on his web log that the findings of this study were ‘quite startling’; mainly, the rather demonstrably self-serving leanings towards land gaming and away from the web version of the same. Namely, legal brick-and-mortar gambling enterprises were found to be ‘a means to create income for the state,’ with approval ratings ranging from high of 66 percent in Pennsylvania (which has already proved just as much using their recent growth in that arena), 61 % in Kentucky, 57 per cent in California and 54 per cent in Virginia.
But the opinions on iGaming were perhaps not quite therefore friendly.
State Budget Crises Affect Outlooks
Particularly interesting there is that neither Kentucky nor Virginia have any land that is legal at this juncture in time. The support stemmed largely from a desire to help offset state budget deficits, even though land-based casino saturation nationwide is already starting to rear its ugly head and there is more flatlining to come, according to some industry experts for Pennsylvania and California. In fact, the latest land casino to go up in Pennsylvania Isle of Capri, situated in southwestern area Farmington has already been forced to layoff 15 % of its workforce just two months after opening.
Virginia study participants reportedly showed a disdain for ‘Las Vegas-style gaming.’ We guess that’s diverse from state, ‘Indian casino-style gaming’ or ‘politicians-from-the-suburbs-style video gaming.’ Just What?
Where this supposedly unbiased study gets interesting is with its reported findings on Internet gambling, however. Because, according to this study, in most four queried states, 3x as numerous of those who participated failed to have positive view of iGaming, by having an overall average margin off 66-22 on the ‘ we don’t enjoy it’ part of the fence. Based on wording (shock, surprise), the views shifted slightly, and Kentucky and Virginia participants stated many vehemently that they were and only online casino bans, by 63-27 and 55-33 margins respectively.
The poll did not plainly differentiate between general Internet gambling and online poker per se, however, and before anybody freaks out excessively in what any one of this might potentially mean for the future of state-by-state iGaming being regulated and legalized, remember that, according to poker advocate Marco Valerio back in 2011, 67 percent of New Jerseyans were dead set against online gambling enterprises, so we see just how that played out.
Supreme Court Judge Rejects Challenge to New York Casino Referendum
Tioga Downs lets its feelings be known in no uncertain terms New that is regarding York’s upcoming casino referendum by voters. (Image source: Ithacajournal.com)
A New York State judge has rejected a challenge to the wording of New York’s upcoming casino referendum, paving the way for voters into the state to vote on the measure in November.
The lawsuit was dismissed by State Supreme Court Justice Richard M. Platkin, who found the legal challenge to be ‘untimely and lacking in legal merit.’
Delayed Vote Shot Down
That was a big blow to opponents of the measure, who had hoped that they might delay a vote, or at least replace the wording that will appear on the ballot. The case had been brought up by Brooklyn bankruptcy lawyer Eric J. Snyder, who objected to the language used into the referendum question. On the ballot, the measure is going to be described as ‘promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.’
That had been the language which had been authorized by the State Board of Elections in July, which consulted with Governor Andrew Cuomo to craft the measure. The governor is a strong supporter of the measure, and crafted an amount of compromises and addresses different passions in their state to create this kind of proposition feasible.
However, Snyder and others said that the language getting used was unfair. Since the language included suggested positive outcomes of the casino expansion, it could unfairly bias the total results of the referendum. These issues gained extra merit when a poll by Siena College found that support for the ballot referendum increased by nine portion points whenever good language was included, compared to when more neutral language was in fact used.
Justice Platkin dismissed these claims, though. He said that Snyder’s lawsuit ended up being filed far after the 14-day window in which challenges to ballot-language are permitted had passed away. That window began on August 19 or possibly August 23, according to Snyder, though that would have made difference that is little the challenge was not made until October 1.
Naturally, the state was delighted that their appropriate arguments were accepted, and that the vote would carry on as prepared.
‘We’re happy that Judge Platkin accepted the arguments that are legal we raised and that the election process can continue moving forward,’ stated Board of Elections spokesman Thomas Connolly.
Opponents Voice Disappointment
Meanwhile club player casino no deposit bonus codes 2016, opponents of the measure were let down by predictably your choice.
‘We’re disappointed that the judge decided to block a genuine discussion on the merits of whether their state gamed the language of the casino amendment to tilt New Yorkers to a yes vote,’ stated a statement by the latest York Public Interest analysis Group (NYPIRG).
But Snyder says that he’s not done yet. He plans to get emergency relief from the appellate courts, and points out that the Board of Elections had the opportunity to use an early in the day form of the referendum suggested by the state attorney general’s workplace that did not include the ‘advocacy language.’
‘Ignoring the attorney general’s recommendation, the Board of Elections changed the neutrally worded casino amendment by adding language to gain voter help,’ Snyder told The nyc days.
In the event that measure should pass, it would talk about to seven casino that is new to selected parts of the Empire State. They would join a quantity of existing casinos that are owned and operated by Native American groups throughout the area.